Immigrants from Lithuania vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,915,699 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.079% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 79.1 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $41,017, a difference of 25.2%), median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $52,306, a difference of 21.1%), and median earnings ($52,769 compared to $45,027, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $55,158, a difference of 0.24%), householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $71,021, a difference of 7.5%), and median household income ($96,836 compared to $89,919, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 38.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.6%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.3%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.6% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (48.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 66.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 35.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 50.7%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 46.5%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.050%), 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.7%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.2%).