Central American Indian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,015,674 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.792% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 1,792.4 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $71,021, a difference of 33.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $105,149, a difference of 21.2%), and median household income ($74,847 compared to $89,919, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $38,461, a difference of 7.0%), median earnings ($41,474 compared to $45,027, a difference of 8.6%), and per capita income ($37,699 compared to $41,017, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 79.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 64.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 20.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and single female poverty (25.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.3%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.6%), births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and married-couple households (43.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.43, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (65.2% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 73.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 45.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 79.7%), ged/equivalency (80.6% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and college, under 1 year (59.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.0%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.1%), male disability (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.5%).