Egyptian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,485,081 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Egyptian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.280. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Egyptians corresponds to a decrease of 22.7 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,358 compared to $41,017, a difference of 17.9%), median male earnings ($61,095 compared to $52,306, a difference of 16.8%), and median earnings ($51,701 compared to $45,027, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,444 compared to $55,158, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and median household income ($95,673 compared to $89,919, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.5%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.35%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 21.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.43, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.040%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 54.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 53.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 31.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 43.4%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.4%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.6%), male disability (10.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.8%).