Chickasaw vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Native Hawaiian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Native Hawaiians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,131
SOCIAL INDEX
58.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
162nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Native Hawaiian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,770,161 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 16.3 Native Hawaiians.
Chickasaw vs Native Hawaiian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $71,021, a difference of 32.2%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $89,919, a difference of 28.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $105,149, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 6.8%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,306, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $45,027, a difference of 10.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Native Hawaiian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $41,017 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Good $104,910 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $89,919 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Poor $45,027 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Poor $52,306 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $55,158 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Average $95,058 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $105,149 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $71,021 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Good 25.4% |
Chickasaw vs Native Hawaiian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 37.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 35.1%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Native Hawaiian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 17.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Excellent 28.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Chickasaw vs Native Hawaiian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Native Hawaiian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Native Hawaiian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Native Hawaiian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Chickasaw vs Native Hawaiian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 5.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Native Hawaiian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 68.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.43 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 34.3% |
Chickasaw vs Native Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.19%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Native Hawaiian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 61.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 24.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Chickasaw vs Native Hawaiian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 13.2%), associate's degree (38.6% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Native Hawaiian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Poor 63.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 43.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chickasaw vs Native Hawaiian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 38.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 5.9%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.0%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Native Hawaiian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |