Burmese vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,431,200 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.045% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 44.7 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,005 compared to $41,017, a difference of 26.8%), median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $52,306, a difference of 24.7%), and median earnings ($54,559 compared to $45,027, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $71,021, a difference of 0.17%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $55,158, a difference of 0.65%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 48.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 22.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 30.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (48.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.6%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 66.7%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 61.5%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.0%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.0%), and 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.7%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.3%).