Filipino vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,924,650 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.140. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to a decrease of 18.8 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($59,066 compared to $41,017, a difference of 44.0%), median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $52,306, a difference of 41.9%), and median earnings ($61,197 compared to $45,027, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $55,158, a difference of 4.7%), householder income over 65 years ($76,686 compared to $71,021, a difference of 8.0%), and wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 73.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 39.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and single father poverty (14.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 49.3%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.4%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 3.8%), married-couple households (51.0% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and currently married (49.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 35.7%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 117.3%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 98.8%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 90.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.14%), 10th grade (94.8% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 44.9%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.6%), and male disability (9.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.4%).