Immigrants from Ecuador vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,040,827 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.025. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $71,021, a difference of 31.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $105,149, a difference of 15.0%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,195 compared to $41,017, a difference of 0.43%), median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $38,461, a difference of 0.48%), and median earnings ($44,462 compared to $45,027, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 60.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 53.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.57%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.9%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 209.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 121.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 86.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 21.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 51.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 86.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 94.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 49.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.9%).