Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,994,281 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 13.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $71,021, a difference of 24.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $105,149, a difference of 15.1%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $89,919, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $38,461, a difference of 1.1%), median earnings ($43,998 compared to $45,027, a difference of 2.3%), and per capita income ($39,827 compared to $41,017, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 27.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.36%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.1%), married-couple households (43.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and family households (62.6% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 50.4%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 32.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 98.6%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (43.7% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.22%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.34%).