Houma vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,327,861 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.535. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 23.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $71,021, a difference of 58.5%), wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 52.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $105,149, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $52,306, a difference of 3.5%), median earnings ($38,949 compared to $45,027, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,044 compared to $95,058, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 85.9%), family poverty (14.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 75.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 37.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 38.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 57.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 46.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 35.7%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.5%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.0%), family households (65.7% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 91.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 55.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 49.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 76.0%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 71.6%), and doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 65.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 73.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 60.2%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.8%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 16.2%).