French Canadian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 314,411,027 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 26.5 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $71,021, a difference of 22.5%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $89,919, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $38,461, a difference of 0.060%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $95,058, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($46,026 compared to $45,027, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 18.0%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.37%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.07 compared to 3.43, a difference of 11.5%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and family households (63.7% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.28%), births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 42.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.15%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (94.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.1%).