Welsh vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,447,816 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Welsh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.398. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Welsh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Welsh corresponds to an increase of 51.2 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Welsh and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,666 compared to $71,021, a difference of 17.1%), wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,597 compared to $55,158, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,710 compared to $45,027, a difference of 1.5%), median female earnings ($37,856 compared to $38,461, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,039 compared to $95,058, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Welsh and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 25.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and single father poverty (17.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.20%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Welsh and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Welsh and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Welsh and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.12 compared to 3.43, a difference of 9.9%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Welsh and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 25.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.58%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Welsh and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.9%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Welsh and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.57%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 1.6%).