Immigrants from Caribbean vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 294,264,660 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.375. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 2.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $71,021, a difference of 46.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $105,149, a difference of 27.4%), and median family income ($83,319 compared to $104,910, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $38,461, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $55,158, a difference of 8.7%), and median earnings ($41,119 compared to $45,027, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 81.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 75.3%), and married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.8%), married-couple households (40.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 20.4%), and divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.43, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 155.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 111.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 71.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 14.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 38.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 71.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 83.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and college, under 1 year (56.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.6% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.0%).