Argentinean vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,155,699 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to a decrease of 15.9 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $41,017, a difference of 21.6%), median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $52,306, a difference of 14.9%), and median earnings ($50,399 compared to $45,027, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $55,158, a difference of 1.8%), median household income ($93,960 compared to $89,919, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $105,149, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 33.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.33%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.64%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.3%), births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.43, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.83%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 52.3%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 55.8%), master's degree (18.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 48.1%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.3%), and male disability (10.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.6%).