Hmong vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,872,659 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 32.6 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $71,021, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $105,149, a difference of 19.3%), and median household income ($75,839 compared to $89,919, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($42,111 compared to $45,027, a difference of 6.9%), per capita income ($38,120 compared to $41,017, a difference of 7.6%), and median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $38,461, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.8%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.91%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 64.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 23.7%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.43, a difference of 6.9%), and family households (64.9% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 23.1%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and bachelor's degree (34.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.42%), 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%).