Chilean vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Native Hawaiian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Native Hawaiians
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,131
SOCIAL INDEX
58.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
162nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Native Hawaiian Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,029,701 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.480. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.618% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 618.0 Native Hawaiians.
Chilean vs Native Hawaiian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $41,017, a difference of 13.3%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $71,021, a difference of 11.0%), and median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $52,306, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($90,605 compared to $89,919, a difference of 0.76%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $105,149, a difference of 1.4%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $104,910, a difference of 3.4%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Native Hawaiian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Tragic $41,017 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Good $104,910 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Exceptional $89,919 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Poor $45,027 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Poor $52,306 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Tragic $38,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Exceptional $55,158 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Average $95,058 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Exceptional $105,149 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Exceptional $71,021 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Good 25.4% |
Chilean vs Native Hawaiian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.7%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.17%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.65%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Native Hawaiian |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 17.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Excellent 28.4% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Chilean vs Native Hawaiian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Native Hawaiian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chilean vs Native Hawaiian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Native Hawaiian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 82.3% |
Chilean vs Native Hawaiian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.6%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.43, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.11%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Native Hawaiian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 68.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Exceptional 49.1% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.43 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Tragic 34.3% |
Chilean vs Native Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 46.7%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 26.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Native Hawaiian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Exceptional 61.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 24.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Chilean vs Native Hawaiian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 38.2%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 38.0%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Native Hawaiian |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Exceptional 87.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Poor 63.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 43.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 12.3% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chilean vs Native Hawaiian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.5%), male disability (10.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.0%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Native Hawaiian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 48.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |