Central American vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,935,828 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.025. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $71,021, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $105,149, a difference of 15.6%), and median family income ($91,087 compared to $104,910, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $55,158, a difference of 4.8%), median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $38,461, a difference of 5.4%), and per capita income ($38,560 compared to $41,017, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 46.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 45.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.2%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and married-couple households (43.9% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.41 compared to 3.43, a difference of 0.45%), family households (66.0% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 32.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 114.6%), college, under 1 year (57.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and ged/equivalency (79.2% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.65%), nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.0%), male disability (10.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.65%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 4.3%).