Immigrants from Ireland vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,249,523 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Ireland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ireland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.158% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ireland corresponds to an increase of 158.2 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($56,584 compared to $41,017, a difference of 38.0%), median male earnings ($67,698 compared to $52,306, a difference of 29.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($120,333 compared to $95,058, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,075 compared to $55,158, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($68,495 compared to $71,021, a difference of 3.7%), and wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 39.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.5%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.4%), births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 26.1%), and single mother households (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (48.0% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 78.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 74.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 43.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 66.5%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 65.6%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 22.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.4%).