British vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,865,933 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within British communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.143% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British corresponds to an increase of 143.2 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 13.6%), per capita income ($46,571 compared to $41,017, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,940 compared to $71,021, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,264 compared to $105,149, a difference of 1.1%), median household income ($88,914 compared to $89,919, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($39,772 compared to $38,461, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 31.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 15.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.2%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.0%), births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.43, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.12%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 30.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.090%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.1%), master's degree (16.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 33.6%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.62%).