Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,459,622 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Sierra Leone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.370. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sierra Leone within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sierra Leone corresponds to a decrease of 37.8 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 18.7%), median female earnings ($42,214 compared to $38,461, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,009 compared to $71,021, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($103,990 compared to $104,910, a difference of 0.89%), median household income ($88,498 compared to $89,919, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,190 compared to $55,158, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.71%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.2%), married-couple households (43.3% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and currently married (43.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 0.17%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.43, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 53.7%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 47.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 55.8%), master's degree (16.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 32.8%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.6%), male disability (10.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 3.0%).