Indian (Asian) vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,493,529 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 23.9 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $41,017, a difference of 31.4%), median male earnings ($66,078 compared to $52,306, a difference of 26.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $95,058, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $71,021, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $55,158, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 33.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.4%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.7%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 35.8%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 30.9%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 82.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 45.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 7.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 84.1%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 71.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 66.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 36.2%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 34.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.1%).