Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,282,697 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to a decrease of 19.8 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $71,021, a difference of 18.7%), per capita income ($43,464 compared to $41,017, a difference of 6.0%), and median household income ($85,054 compared to $89,919, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $52,306, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $38,461, a difference of 1.9%), and median earnings ($45,928 compared to $45,027, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 31.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 25.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.56%), single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.9%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.43, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (28.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 44.5%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.0%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (57.5% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.1%), male disability (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.54%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.0%).