Native/Alaskan vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,148,050 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 9.5 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $71,021, a difference of 36.4%), median household income ($67,879 compared to $89,919, a difference of 32.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $105,149, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $38,461, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $55,158, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 76.9%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 71.5%), and male poverty (16.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 28.8%), receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 34.7%), and single female poverty (28.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 41.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 44.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.0%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.5%), and births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.45 compared to 3.43, a difference of 0.62%), family households (66.4% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.9%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 44.3%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%).