Latvian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,035,054 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.889% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 1,889.5 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $41,017, a difference of 28.4%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $52,306, a difference of 21.4%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $45,027, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $55,158, a difference of 4.5%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $71,021, a difference of 5.5%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $89,919, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 40.6%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.46%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.4%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.69%), currently married (48.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 53.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 29.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 64.1%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 63.0%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 61.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.3%).