Norwegian vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,601,576 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 9.5 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $57,975, a difference of 5.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $99,093, a difference of 4.6%), and median family income ($106,144 compared to $101,634, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $52,672, a difference of 0.86%), median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $38,436, a difference of 0.95%), and median earnings ($46,865 compared to $46,026, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 4.4%), single female poverty (20.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 17.3%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.08 compared to 3.07, a difference of 0.24%), family households (63.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.3%), college, 1 year or more (61.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and college, under 1 year (68.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.0%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.4%).