Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,388,552 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Immigrant from Sierra Leone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.363. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sierra Leone within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.111% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sierra Leone corresponds to a decrease of 110.6 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 31.0%), householder income over 65 years ($66,009 compared to $57,975, a difference of 13.9%), and median female earnings ($42,214 compared to $38,436, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($42,752 compared to $43,003, a difference of 0.59%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,115 compared to $93,694, a difference of 0.62%), and median male earnings ($53,905 compared to $54,722, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.4%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and family poverty (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.8%), family households with children (29.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and married-couple households (43.3% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 0.46%), family households (64.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.4%), master's degree (16.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 49.6%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 49.4%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.2%).