Immigrants from Costa Rica vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,744,971 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to a decrease of 6.2 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 13.6%), householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $57,975, a difference of 3.2%), and median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $54,722, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $52,672, a difference of 0.060%), median earnings ($45,928 compared to $46,026, a difference of 0.21%), and median family income ($101,354 compared to $101,634, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.0%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 31.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.3%), family households with children (28.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.07, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.58%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (65.6% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 53.0%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.020%), associate's degree (45.0% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and college, 1 year or more (57.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.35%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%).