Arapaho vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,187,140 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 15.2 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $43,003, a difference of 33.0%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $54,722, a difference of 31.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $93,694, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $57,975, a difference of 2.4%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 19.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $52,672, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 55.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 54.5%), and single male poverty (21.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 8.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 126.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 122.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 118.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 36.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and currently married (40.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (66.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 41.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 28.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.8%), master's degree (10.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.9%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 41.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.42%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.6%).