Hawaiian vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,540,847 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 10.5 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.8%), householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $57,975, a difference of 12.0%), and per capita income ($39,403 compared to $43,003, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $99,093, a difference of 0.32%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $52,672, a difference of 0.77%), and median household income ($84,729 compared to $82,810, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 23.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 27.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.5%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.07, a difference of 10.9%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.62%), currently married (46.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 17.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.29%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.9%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.47%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.9%).