Lithuanian vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 399,755,815 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.621. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.792% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 792.2 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $43,003, a difference of 15.0%), median family income ($115,395 compared to $101,634, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $99,093, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $52,672, a difference of 1.7%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $38,436, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 6.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and single father poverty (17.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 16.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.58%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.07, a difference of 0.96%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.66%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 34.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.7%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.9%).