Immigrants from Moldova vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,924,640 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.178% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 178.2 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,489 compared to $43,003, a difference of 10.4%), median household income ($91,446 compared to $82,810, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $38,436, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $52,672, a difference of 6.6%), wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,091 compared to $93,694, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 22.3%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.4%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 26.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.89%), currently married (48.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and family households (64.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.5%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.4%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.060%), high school diploma (90.7% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and 11th grade (93.7% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.7%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.1%).