Immigrants from Australia vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,466,179 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.221% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 220.6 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $43,003, a difference of 34.8%), median family income ($126,620 compared to $101,634, a difference of 24.6%), and median household income ($102,562 compared to $82,810, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.49%), householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $52,672, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $57,975, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and poverty (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 38.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.47%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 29.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.7%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.45%), currently married (47.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.07, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 76.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 72.0%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.2%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.0%).