Immigrants from Uruguay vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,132,809 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.879% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 879.3 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 14.0%), median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $54,722, a difference of 3.5%), and median family income ($98,205 compared to $101,634, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($82,560 compared to $82,810, a difference of 0.30%), householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $52,672, a difference of 0.71%), and median earnings ($45,682 compared to $46,026, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 34.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 29.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.43%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 48.8%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.5%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.32%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 52.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (58.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.40%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 52.8%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 38.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.8%).