Native/Alaskan vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,086,188 people shows no correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $43,003, a difference of 29.2%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $101,634, a difference of 25.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $99,093, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $52,672, a difference of 10.4%), householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $57,975, a difference of 11.3%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $38,436, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 92.7%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 75.3%), and male poverty (16.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 18.9%), single father poverty (22.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and single female poverty (28.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 50.4%), male unemployment (7.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 50.3%), and unemployment (7.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.4%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.8%), and births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (66.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.7%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 41.8%), and professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 28.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and female disability (14.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.1%).