Immigrants from Armenia vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,885,096 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Immigrant from Armenia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Armenia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Armenia corresponds to a decrease of 31.1 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 35.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,974 compared to $57,975, a difference of 7.4%), and median male earnings ($51,793 compared to $54,722, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,094 compared to $46,026, a difference of 0.15%), householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $52,672, a difference of 0.60%), and median household income ($83,555 compared to $82,810, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 67.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 54.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 71.7%), female unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 47.6%), and unemployment (7.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 50.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.1% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 32.0%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.5%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.26%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (44.3% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 123.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and bachelor's degree (39.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (64.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.78%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.76% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 148.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 65.7%), and self-care disability (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 6.8%).