Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
French Canadian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

French Canadians

Tragic
Average
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,542
SOCIAL INDEX
52.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
175th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

French Canadian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,669,983 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.686. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 28.4 French Canadians.
Tohono O'odham Integration in French Canadian Communities

Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $43,003, a difference of 42.1%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $101,634, a difference of 40.8%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $54,722, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $38,436, a difference of 15.8%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $52,672, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $57,975, a difference of 18.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamFrench Canadian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Fair
$43,003
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Fair
$101,634
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Poor
$82,810
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Fair
$46,026
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Average
$54,722
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$38,436
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Good
$52,672
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Fair
$93,694
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Fair
$99,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$57,975
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
28.1%

Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 164.1%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 150.6%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 117.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 18.6%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 39.7%), and single male poverty (21.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 47.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamFrench Canadian
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Good
11.4%

Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 97.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 96.1%), and unemployment (8.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 82.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamFrench Canadian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
11.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Excellent
5.2%

Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 39.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 9.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamFrench Canadian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
64.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Average
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Poor
82.5%

Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 60.2%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 51.1%), and births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 5.4%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 7.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamFrench Canadian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.07
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
48.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
34.4%

Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 99.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.27%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamFrench Canadian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
58.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Excellent
6.6%

Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.1%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 45.9%), and master's degree (9.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamFrench Canadian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Poor
64.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Poor
57.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Poor
44.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
35.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Poor
14.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 51.9%), ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.0%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and male disability (14.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 10.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs French Canadian Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamFrench Canadian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Good
47.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.6%