Menominee vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,471,090 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Menominee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.335. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Menominee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Menominee corresponds to a decrease of 15.2 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Menominee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,903 compared to $99,093, a difference of 28.8%), median male earnings ($42,581 compared to $54,722, a difference of 28.5%), and median family income ($79,563 compared to $101,634, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,907 compared to $52,672, a difference of 10.0%), householder income over 65 years ($51,719 compared to $57,975, a difference of 12.1%), and median female earnings ($33,894 compared to $38,436, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Menominee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 56.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (25.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 55.5%), and receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Menominee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (10.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 121.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 60.3%), and female unemployment (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Menominee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 28.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Menominee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 76.7%), single mother households (9.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 51.6%), and births to unmarried women (51.1% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 4.5%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and average family size (3.30 compared to 3.07, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Menominee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 50.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Menominee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.6%), and bachelor's degree (27.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Menominee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age under 5 (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 1.9%), disability (13.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.0%).