Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,622,519 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.261% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 260.8 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $43,003, a difference of 20.4%), median household income ($95,319 compared to $82,810, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $57,975, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $52,672, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $99,093, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 20.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 21.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.34%), family households (63.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 50.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 45.0%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.6%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.040%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and 11th grade (93.8% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 29.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.7%).