Immigrants from Iraq vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,692,583 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Immigrant from Iraq communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iraq within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iraq corresponds to an increase of 21.4 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,444 compared to $93,694, a difference of 4.8%), and per capita income ($41,365 compared to $43,003, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($82,594 compared to $82,810, a difference of 0.26%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,201 compared to $99,093, a difference of 0.91%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,384 compared to $52,672, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 33.8%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 30.2%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.37%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 26.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.48%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.26%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.5%), bachelor's degree (37.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.1% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.95%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.7% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.4%).