Portuguese vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 420,242,356 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 72.5 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($88,976 compared to $82,810, a difference of 7.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $99,093, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $93,694, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.6%), per capita income ($44,362 compared to $43,003, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $52,672, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 14.6%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.32%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.8%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.51%), currently married (47.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.1%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 0.40%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.5%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and ged/equivalency (85.0% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.38%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.3%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.36%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.95%).