Houma vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,587,638 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.100% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 100.4 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 37.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $99,093, a difference of 37.4%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $101,634, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $54,722, a difference of 8.3%), median earnings ($38,949 compared to $46,026, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $52,672, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 79.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 65.0%), and single male poverty (23.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 28.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 31.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 62.5%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.4%), and unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 35.3%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.2%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.2%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.07, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 86.0%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 85.7%), and professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.3%), 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 44.8%), and ambulatory disability (9.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.62%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.9%).