Malaysian vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,305,134 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 56.7 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.1%), per capita income ($39,194 compared to $43,003, a difference of 9.7%), and median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $54,722, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $57,975, a difference of 0.46%), householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $52,672, a difference of 2.1%), and median household income ($81,064 compared to $82,810, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.9%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 24.3%), and family poverty (9.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (22.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.9%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 84.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.5%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 45.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.87%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.5%).