Ecuadorian vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,700,755 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 9.3 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 22.5%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $101,634, a difference of 6.9%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $54,722, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($82,070 compared to $82,810, a difference of 0.90%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $38,436, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $46,026, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 42.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 0.080%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 38.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.1%), currently married (43.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.020%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 190.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 18.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 40.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 46.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 97.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.2%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.65%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 71.8%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 51.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.25%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.42%).