Fijian vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,867,845 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.540. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 24.8 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 22.5%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $54,722, a difference of 20.0%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $43,003, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $57,975, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $52,672, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $38,436, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 35.9%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and male poverty (12.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.78%), single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 55.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.99%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.9%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (46.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 65.3%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.9%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (13.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 3.7%).