Houma Disability Age 5 to 17
COMPARE
Houma
Select to Compare
Disability Age 5 to 17
Houma Disability Age 5 to 17
9.1%
DISABILITY | AGE 5 TO 17
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,699,710 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132 and weighted average of 9.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.25% in percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Houma and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Houma influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 within an area, or if Houma simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Houma by Disability Age 5 to 17
In terms of disability age 5 to 17, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Puerto Rican (8.3%, a difference of 9.3%), Tsimshian (7.9%, a difference of 14.2%), Cajun (7.2%, a difference of 26.1%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (7.1%, a difference of 27.0%), and Chippewa (7.1%, a difference of 27.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 5 to 17 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.1% |
Houma Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma Data | Disability Age 5 to 17 Data |
| Minimum | 0.012% | 4.1% |
| Maximum | 14.2% | 27.8% |
| Range | 14.2% | 23.7% |
| Mean | 3.6% | 12.3% |
| Median | 3.0% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.9% |
Correlation Details
| Houma Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age 5 to 17 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 35,219,885 | 5.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 556,501 | 8.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 299,970 | 7.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 258,521 | 7.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 77,227 | 9.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 39,785 | 16.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 1,396 | 12.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 25,087 | 8.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 11,896 | 14.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 9,448 | 13.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 8,600 | 11.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 7,741 | 11.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 7,961 | 16.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 25,742 | 11.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 5,118 | 26.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 58 | 27.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 33,094 | 10.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 15,373 | 4.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 11,624 | 16.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.40% | 2,386 | 21.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 30,192 | 8.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 35,760 | 11.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.46% | 5,845 | 6.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 3,762 | 10.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 2,880 | 5.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.84% | 2,511 | 9.1% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18% | 1,347 | 18.8% |