Houma Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Houma
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Houma Ambulatory Disability
9.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,798,241 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.808 and weighted average of 9.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.50% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Houma and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Houma influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Houma simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Houma by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (9.5%, a difference of 2.5%), Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 4.9%), Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 5.5%), Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 8.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |
Houma Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
Minimum | 0.012% | 5.4% |
Maximum | 44.9% | 30.1% |
Range | 44.9% | 24.8% |
Mean | 6.3% | 11.2% |
Median | 3.1% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.6% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 6.5% |
Correlation Details
Houma Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 35,258,017 | 6.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 575,680 | 8.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 304,570 | 7.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 264,900 | 8.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 85,949 | 8.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 43,230 | 10.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 4,545 | 10.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 25,087 | 7.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 15,031 | 7.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 11,415 | 12.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 8,600 | 7.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 9,287 | 10.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 7,961 | 6.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 26,788 | 9.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 5,118 | 6.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 5,677 | 10.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 33,094 | 9.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 15,373 | 12.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 11,624 | 6.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.40% | 2,386 | 5.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 30,192 | 8.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 35,760 | 7.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.46% | 5,845 | 10.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 3,762 | 19.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 2,880 | 13.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.84% | 2,511 | 8.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18% | 1,347 | 30.1% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.88% | 844 | 28.7% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.92% | 768 | 27.1% |