Houma Vision Disability
COMPARE
Houma
Select to Compare
Vision Disability
Houma Vision Disability
3.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,790,703 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044 and weighted average of 3.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.0067% in percentage of population with vision disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Houma and percentage of population with vision disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Houma influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with vision disability within an area, or if Houma simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with vision disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Houma by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Pima (3.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 5.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |
Houma Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma Data | Vision Disability Data |
Minimum | 0.012% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 44.9% | 9.0% |
Range | 44.9% | 7.8% |
Mean | 6.3% | 3.8% |
Median | 3.1% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 4.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.6% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 1.6% |
Correlation Details
Houma Percentile | Sample Size | Vision Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 35,257,360 | 2.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 573,742 | 3.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 300,673 | 3.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 264,900 | 3.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 85,949 | 4.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 43,230 | 9.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 4,545 | 1.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 25,087 | 2.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 15,031 | 5.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 11,415 | 4.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 8,600 | 4.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 9,287 | 4.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 7,961 | 4.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 25,742 | 2.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 5,118 | 3.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 5,677 | 4.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 33,094 | 2.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 15,373 | 4.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 11,624 | 7.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.40% | 2,386 | 4.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 30,192 | 2.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 35,760 | 3.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.46% | 5,845 | 1.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 3,762 | 3.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 2,880 | 2.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.84% | 2,511 | 2.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18% | 1,347 | 3.9% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.88% | 844 | 4.6% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.92% | 768 | 4.3% |