Houma Male Disability
COMPARE
Houma
Select to Compare
Male Disability
Houma Male Disability
17.4%
DISABILITY | MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,793,255 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.804 and weighted average of 17.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.73% in percentage of males with a disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Houma and percentage of males with a disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Houma influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of males with a disability within an area, or if Houma simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of males with a disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Houma by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Colville (16.5%, a difference of 5.7%), Tsimshian (15.6%, a difference of 11.8%), Puerto Rican (15.6%, a difference of 12.1%), Creek (15.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and Kiowa (15.4%, a difference of 13.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.4% |
Houma Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma Data | Male Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.012% | 11.6% |
| Maximum | 44.9% | 46.6% |
| Range | 44.9% | 35.0% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 21.8% |
| Median | 3.3% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 23.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 9.2% |
Correlation Details
| Houma Percentile | Sample Size | Male Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 35,258,017 | 11.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 573,737 | 16.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 300,673 | 16.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 265,274 | 17.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 85,949 | 16.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 43,230 | 21.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 4,545 | 14.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 25,087 | 14.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 15,031 | 21.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 11,415 | 23.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 8,600 | 18.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 9,287 | 20.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 7,961 | 18.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 26,788 | 16.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 5,118 | 24.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 5,677 | 18.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 33,094 | 16.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 15,373 | 15.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 11,624 | 20.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.40% | 2,386 | 12.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 30,192 | 17.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 35,760 | 15.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.46% | 5,845 | 18.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 3,762 | 27.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 286 | 43.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 2,880 | 17.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.84% | 2,511 | 22.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.82% | 194 | 25.0% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18% | 1,347 | 39.8% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.88% | 844 | 46.6% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.92% | 768 | 45.5% |