Swiss vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 435,526,726 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.486. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to a decrease of 32.9 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 20.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $55,714, a difference of 8.2%), and median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $40,558, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $55,241, a difference of 0.89%), per capita income ($44,076 compared to $43,539, a difference of 1.2%), and median family income ($104,396 compared to $106,252, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.4%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.8%), female unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and male unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.9%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.36, a difference of 6.6%), and currently married (49.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.38%), married-couple households (49.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.2% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 0.39%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 89.6%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (37.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 1.1%), college, 1 year or more (59.2% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 42.3%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.6%).