Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,875,499 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Bangladeshi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.751. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bangladeshis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.376% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bangladeshis corresponds to an increase of 376.4 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,112 compared to $91,541, a difference of 23.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,363 compared to $100,283, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,402 compared to $106,109, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 11.9%), median female earnings ($35,960 compared to $40,558, a difference of 12.8%), and median earnings ($41,263 compared to $47,671, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 35.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 31.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.3%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.5%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.37 compared to 3.36, a difference of 0.31%), family households with children (30.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (64.3% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.070%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.0%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 33.3%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (94.3% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and 11th grade (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.8% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.5%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 7.0%).