Fijian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,249,939 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.591% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 591.3 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $100,283, a difference of 25.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $106,109, a difference of 24.6%), and median household income ($74,205 compared to $91,541, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 8.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $55,714, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $64,089, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 27.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 27.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.6%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.36, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 52.4%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.9%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.2% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (94.7% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and 9th grade (93.1% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 25.1%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.77%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.9%).